BACKGROUND
Phasing out harmful contaminants
Lead. PFAS. Perchlorate. Drinking water can have numerous chemical and microbial contaminants like these, putting millions of Americans at risk. The public sector needs evidence, tools, and technological innovations to identify how to mitigate risk in a cost-effective way.
Abt Global has managed, supported, and provided drinking water technical assistance to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other Federal agencies for more than 40 years, including its efforts to ensure that lead pipes are identified and removed everywhere from cities to tribal lands. We supported the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to measure and tackle contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). And we’re providing EPA with regulatory development support for:
- Perchlorate, a contaminant used in rocket fuel and missiles
- Microbial contaminants, bacteria and viruses that cause disease
- Disinfection byproducts, the unintended consequences of inactivating microbial contaminants.
Abt’s environmental team recently supported the EPA to finalize two landmark regulatory processes—to address lead, copper, and PFAS—that will improve drinking water safety for millions of people.
WHAT WE'RE DOING
Tools and approaches to protect individuals and communities
As awareness grows about PFAS, communities want to know more about their exposure and risks. Abt developed a series of pharmacokinetic models to estimate blood PFAS levels due to the consumption of contaminated drinking water. These models incorporate background exposures and a person’s life stage, and account for uncertainty in the person’s potential exposure to PFAS.
Our teams used machine learning to calibrate, test and refine the models. We then built an online tool for users to estimate their personal PFAS exposure with no blood samples required. This gives people concerned about their own exposure more information to address their potential risk and helps fill a gap when blood testing is expensive or difficult to access. Since its launch, the PFAS Blood Level Estimation Tool website has been accessed by individuals in all 50 states and more than five countries.
Our multidisciplinary teams are critical to providing the innovative and comprehensive studies our clients need.
– Emma Glidden-Lyon, Environmental Policy and Regulatory Associate
We also collaborate with communities through information sessions and social media ad campaigns. Abt’s ad campaign in support of ATSDR’s PFAS exposure assessments produced nearly 2 million impressions (number of times the ads were seen) and nearly 2,500 link clicks in eight geotargeted communities.
Finally, we develop drinking water treatment technology evaluations that have been used by engineers and communities to evaluate the costs and effectiveness of different approaches to treat PFAS in community drinking water.
Science to advance water treatment technology
As the EPA updated regulations for emerging contaminants, Abt supported the Agency’s Office of Water to evaluate drinking water treatment technologies. Our analyses have covered national technologies and costs, best available technologies designation, and affordability of small system compliance for carcinogenic volatile organic compounds, fluoride, PFAS, and perchlorate. We’re currently developing these analyses for microbial contaminants and disinfection byproducts.
For each technology, we provided everything from detailed cost estimates and assessments of effectiveness for the target contaminant to pre- and post-treatment requirements, history of full-scale operation, and geographic applicability.
Any practical program for treating contaminants requires accurate cost estimates for the full treatment lifecycle and an understanding of what you get for the money: the treatment’s effectiveness. The EPA is required to consider costs and benefits, but that’s also how to build political support for the spending.
– Pat Ransom, Environmental Science Senior Associate
We have also reviewed scientific and engineering literature to add data to the EPA’s Drinking Water Treatability Database for other emerging contaminants, including 1,4-dioxane, anatoxin, arsenic, cis- and trans-1,2-dichloethylene, cyanide, cylindrospermopsin, fluoride, iodide, lithium, natural organic matter, microcystins, radium, strontium, trichloroethylene, and uranium.
We expanded the database’s coverage from two PFAS compounds in 2015 to more than 70 PFAS compounds today. The treatment technology cost models we developed for EPA can estimate costs for removing PFAS and more than 40 other contaminants, including many of those on EPA’s latest Contaminant Candidate List. These adaptable models can be extended to treatment for nearly any contaminant.
Data and analyses to inform rulemaking for safe drinking water
PFAS. Abt was instrumental in developing the economic analyses for the EPA’s PFAS rules in 2024 rules for PFAS. We led development of national compliance cost estimates and compared these estimates to projected public health benefits. We analyzed treatment effectiveness and affordability required to designate processes as best available technologies and small system compliance technologies. Our national spatial analysis helped EPA understand how the rule may affect communities facing socioeconomic and environmental challenges—and how to improve outcomes in these areas.
Lead and copper. For the EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR) and the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI), Abt modeled exposure to lead from drinking water to estimate the risk to human health. We also modified the SafeWater tool for lead and copper to estimate the benefits and costs of the rule under different options. We developed and implemented several approaches to evaluate how blood lead levels change with increasing exposures to lead in drinking water, while also considering non-drinking water sources of lead exposure.
Perchlorate. Abt supported the EPA’s development of an initial Maximum Contaminant Level Goal for perchlorate in 2019. When the EPA revisited the perchlorate standard in 2025, they turned to Abt again. We reviewed and developed modeling of the occurrence of perchlorate in drinking water using a Bayesian Hierarchical Model and simulated samples of drinking water with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo. We conducted research into the health effects associated with perchlorate and updated analyses by incorporating recent scientific findings on technology effectiveness and the latest unit costs from treatment technology vendors. And we developed the economic analysis for the EPA’s proposed perchlorate drinking water standard that synthesizes this research into national costs and benefits estimates. We are currently supporting the final National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for perchlorate.
Abt’s experience with every phase of drinking water regulation enables us to devise tailored solutions for different contexts. The SafeWater CBX computer model, for example, can assess different combinations of maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) and other model parameters. It can estimate benefit-cost ratios and economic impacts for different contaminants. The model can also simultaneously consider two or more user-specified MCLs for easy comparisons. Its flexibility is critical because factors like populations, exposure levels, environmental factors, and budget constraints vary from community to community.
IMPACT