Experts Radha Roy, Brooke Abrams, Tresa Kappil, Marissa Cuellar, Holly Harris, and Hannah Engle at Abt’s booth at the 2023 NARWS Workshop.
Experts Radha Roy, Brooke Abrams, Tresa Kappil, Marissa Cuellar, Holly Harris, and Hannah Engle at Abt’s booth at the 2023 NARWS Workshop.
Since the onset of COVID-19, changes in the labor market—such as worker shortages and a renewed focus on worker protection and rights—have highlighted the importance of focusing on job quality in workforce development programs. Those with the lowest wages—who are disproportionately people of color and women—often face the least job stability, agency, and opportunities for advancement to quality jobs. For example, lack of access to what are the hallmarks of quality jobs—benefits like health insurance, retirement savings, and paid (and unpaid) family and medical leave—limits low-wage workers’ abilities to improve their economic stability and build savings and wealth. Workforce development programs are therefore increasingly tailoring their approaches to both focus on quality jobs and recognize disparities in job quality based on race and gender.
As researchers studying these efforts, we are also increasingly emphasizing job quality and equity in our studies. As we integrate our takeaways from the recent National Association for Welfare Research and Statistics (NAWRS) Workshop ahead of gathering with other policy researchers at the Association for Public Policy Analysis & Management’s (APPAM) Fall Research Conference, here are three priorities on our minds for equitable approaches to evidence-building on workforce development:
1. Start with the needs of workers and what they want out of their jobs. It might seem obvious: people work to earn money and higher wages. But research on workforce development requires understanding the fuller picture: how workers feel about their jobs, why they decide to pursue a particular job, barriers they face on the job, and what their job means to them in the context of their family life. Centering the experiences of workers in our research has shed light on what their priorities are. For example, in Abt’s evaluation of the Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG) program—components of which we presented at NAWRS and will also share at APPAM—we learned that participants in training programs persisted not just to earn more money, but also to be a role model for their children, to earn a higher wage in order to work fewer jobs and spend time with family, and to gain greater job satisfaction. Insights presented at NAWRS from our Guaranteed Income team’s research with low-income parents illustrated the careful decisions parents make about factors like job schedules and commute times so that they can participate fully in their children’s lives.